Home / Insights / Generative AI and LLMs

RAG or fine-tuning? Giving an AI model your company knowledge

Teams often assume they must train a model on their documents. In most cases retrieval is simpler, cheaper and easier to keep up to date. Here is how to tell which approach fits.

TopicsGenerative AI and LLMsAI and Machine Learning

PoliteTech Editorial · Generative AI and LLMs

Two different problems

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) gives a model the right information at the moment it answers, by searching your documents and inserting relevant passages into the prompt. Fine-tuning changes how a model behaves by training it on examples. One supplies knowledge; the other shapes style, format or specialised skills.

When RAG is the right choice

  • Your information changes often: policies, prices, product details, documentation.
  • Answers must cite sources so users can verify them.
  • Different users may see different documents, so permissions matter.
  • You want to start quickly without collecting training data.

When fine-tuning helps

  • You need a consistent output format or tone across thousands of requests.
  • The task is narrow and repeated, such as classifying tickets into your own categories.
  • A smaller fine-tuned model can replace a larger one to reduce cost or latency.
  • You have enough high-quality examples of correct outputs.

Where projects go wrong

The most common problem is poor retrieval rather than a weak model: documents split in the wrong places, missing metadata, outdated copies or no permission filtering. Another is skipping evaluation. Without a set of real questions and expected answers, it is impossible to tell whether a change made things better or worse.

Combining both

Mature systems often use both: RAG supplies current facts with citations, while a fine-tuned or carefully prompted model produces answers in the required structure. Start with RAG and good prompts, measure quality on your own questions and only add fine-tuning when the evaluation shows a clear gap.

A practical starting plan

  • Choose one knowledge domain and collect 30–50 real questions with known answers.
  • Index the relevant documents with metadata and access rules.
  • Measure retrieval accuracy and answer faithfulness on your question set.
  • Improve chunking, search and prompts before considering fine-tuning.
  • Decide hosting based on data policy: hosted API, your cloud or private deployment.

Planning a similar project?

Tell us about your situation and we will suggest a practical next step.